ICT-2 releases full verdict in Abu Sayed killing case
State-appointed lawyer Sujad Mia represented the absconding accused
Daily Sun Report, Dhaka
Published: 14 Jun 2026, 04:52 PM
File Photo
According to tribunal sources, the complete
judgment, consisting of 809 pages, was published on Sunday.
Earlier on 9 April, the ICT-2 led by Justice Nazrul
Islam Chowdhury sentenced two police personnel to death in connection with the
killing.
Three other accused were handed life imprisonment,
while the remaining defendants received various prison terms.
The tribunal had fixed 5 March for delivering the
verdict after hearing final arguments from both the prosecution and defence.
Abu Sayed, a student of the 12th batch of the
English Department at Begum Rokeya University, was shot dead by police on 16
July 2024, at Park Mor in front of the university during the July uprising.
The incident later led to the filing of a
crimes-against-humanity case before the tribunal. A total of 30 individuals,
including former university vice-chancellor Md Hasibur Rashid, were named as
accused in the case.
Of them, 24, including the former vice-chancellor,
remain absconding.
So far, six accused have been arrested. They include
former university proctor Shariful Islam, former assistant registrar Rafiul
Hasan, former contractual employee Anwar Parvez, former assistant sub-inspector
Amir Hossain, former constable Sujan Chandra Roy, and Chhatra League leader
Imran Chowdhury, also known as Akash.
The prosecution was represented by Prosecutors Mizanul
Islam and Gazi MH Tamim, while the defence team included lawyers Aminul Gani
Tito, Azizur Rahman Dulu, and others.
State-appointed lawyer Sujad Mia represented the
absconding accused.
Following the verdict, Chief Prosecutor Mohammad
Aminul Islam expressed confidence in the case, saying investigators had
gathered clear and irrefutable evidence.
He said the prosecution believed the charges against
the accused had been proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Defence lawyers, however, maintained that the prosecution
failed to establish the allegations and argued that the accused should have
been acquitted.

